Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Film reviews’ Category

Film review: Persuasion (2007)
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: ***1/2 (out of 5)
Credits: Writers: Based on the novel, Persuasion, by Jane Austen. Screenplay by Simon Burke. Directed by: Adrian Shergold. Cast includes: Sally Hawkins, Rupert Penry-Jones and Anthony Head.

Lovely television movie of this Jane Austen tale starring Sally Hawkins, Rupert Penry-Jones and Anthony Head. Anne Elliot has always loved Captain Wentworth despite initially turning down a marriage proposal from him eight years before his current return to woo her again. She had been persuaded by her ‘friend’ Lady Russell to turn down her true love because he had no money. Now, Captain Wentworth has made his fortune in the British navy and Anne has a chance to try and win him back – as long as she doesn’t take the wrong council again. After many twists of plot, are they back together without miscommunication? Watch this tense and lovely film to find out.

Haven’t read the book, so not sure how closely it follows it, but it is a good made-for-TV film. Sometimes, perhaps, the actors take themselves too seriously. But, it is still pretty – costumes, sets and actors are all good. Recommended.

Further information:
Persuasion (IMDB)
Jane Austen (Wikipedia)

 

Read Full Post »

Film review: The Host (2013)
UK release date: 29 March 2013
Stats: Based on the book by Stephenie Meyer (author of The Twilight Saga). Directed by Andrew Niccol.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: **1/2 (out of 5)

A  very standard, but overall, enjoyable aliens invasion/action film and also sappy romance – the last part seems to come inherently with Stephenie Meyer book-to-film conversions. Reminds me of a teen/cutesy/romantic version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers meets American alien television series V (1984). An alien race has come to Earth and decided to implant their species into humans. Humans don’t like it so they fight back and get the invaders out as much as they can – to begin with this is by killing them, then one of the alients convinces them not to do it that way.

Not really worth seeing but it has a fairly enjoyable plotline, good character development and is easy to understand. This film gets a slightly higher than expected rating because it took the time to develop the story and characters and give the movie a beginning, middle and end that you can sense through the film – whereas many action, alien, horror and teen films from Hollywood right now can move too fast with no storyline or character development. Not worth the money to pay for, but better than you’d expect if you do come across it somehow.

Further information:
The Host (IMDB)
Stephanie Meyer (Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

Fashion review: Anna Karenina film (2012 – starring Keira Knightley) costumes exhibition
26 January to 4 April 2013
Long Gallery, Ham House, Ham Street, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 7RS
Ham House – map
Overall rating: *** (out of 5)
Setting of exhibition: ***** (out of 5)
Costumes themselves: **** (out of 5) – very beautiful. (Tip off: one of Anna’s/Keira’s silk and Tafetta fairytale princess-type dresses is on display too!)
How costumes are displayed & information about event/each item on display: **1/2 (out of 5)
Review by: Alexa Williamson

A mixed bag, but overall the exhibition is enticingly historic, unique and beautiful! So, here we have about 10 of the costumes from the film Anna Karenina (2012), which starred British actors Keira Knightley (Anna Karenin- and also interesting to note that Keira once lived in Teddington, which is a few miles from Ham House), Jude Law (Alexis Karenin) and Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Count Vronsky) as the main characters from this book by Russian author Leo Tolstoy. The story is about Russian upper and middle class people who have a little bit of money and dignity to begin with, but then lose it all as the story progresses. Anna also goes mad as she is torn between her strict and emotionless husband and the gutless playboy Count Vronsky. This is a painful story of Anna losing everything, but because of the period, if you like 19th century ball and opera gowns, and jackets and chap trousers and military uniforms for men, then you will love the costumes in the film.

Jacqueline Durran is a clever and wonderful costume designer. She is not that well known unless you work in the (British and Hollywood) film industry and know her work through her films. She won an award for the costumes in the film Vera Drake (2004 – written and directed by Mike Leigh), but this is not a film that instantly comes to mind. It was a success right when it was released but is not that often recounted in general daily conversation.

Durran does quite a few vintage films and the costumes from Anna Karenina are a lot of fun. With Knightley’s dresses on display as well as  a few others, including also a corset and the heavy suits worn by the men, you get a sense of how she thought about things when preparing the ‘wearables’ for the film – and also how tiny cast was. From the mannequins, Knightley and Taylor-Johnson both looked to be about 5′ 4″. The costumes are highly detailed and made from beautiful fabrics. They are cut fairly sharply, particularly for the women and are lovely affairs, which one would picture being worn at London’s Royal Opera House during Queen Victoria’s time. They are also, generally on a par with Gone with the Wind (1939), but have been slightly less elaborate than say Funny Girl (1968) starring Barbra Streisand. (Yes, it is a different era, but  it was still a period piece with a very girly feel – like this film).

Besides being surrounded by the beautiful costumes when you visit this exhibition, Ham House is a perfect place to host the exhibition. Ironically, scenes from the film were also shot here so not only does it seem like an enchanting, regal and historic place for them to be seen, they are linked to the house through the filming here.

This exhibition is fun and complements the long gallery, which they are seen in, very well. After reading and absorbing the great historical information at both the National Portrait Gallery’s Man Ray exhibition (7 February to 27 May 2013) and also the Hollywood Costume exhibition (20 October 2012 to 13 January 2013) at the Victoria and Albert Museum, I wish the information here had been more like both of those as they were concise but also very informative. The information that goes with the show here is short but doesn’t actually say that much. Anna Karenina costumes ends one day after this is written, but if you do get a chance or if they ever invent time machines, then it is worth visiting!

Further information:
Anna Karenina the film (2012) (IMDB)
Anna Karenina film 2012 – review (The London Reviewer)
Leo Tolstoy author of Anna Karenina
Anna Karenina the novel (Wikipedia)
Ham House (National Trust – official site)
Ham House (Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013)
UK release date: 22 March 2013
Viewing date:  25 March 2013
Stats: Directed by Bryan Singer, Stars: Nicholas Hoult, Eleanor Tomlinson, Ewan McGregor.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: ***1/2 (out of 5)

Simply put… one of those films that is and does ‘exactly what it says on the tin’.

This is an adventure and action film about hunting and slaying giants – with a marriage between peasant farm boy Jack (Hoult) and a princess named Isabelle (Tomlinson) thrown in.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey has been the big fantasy/adventure movie, (directed by Peter Jackson and starring Ian McKellen [as Gandalf], Martin Freeman [as Bilbo] and others) of 2013, and interestingly, this feels like it is a part of it that has been taken out and made into its own film (possibly right around the point where the mountain trolls captured Bilbo and the dwarves).

There is nothing particularly extraordinary about this film, but the special effects are ok and it is fun to see an English, possibly Saxon, countryside (and related sets, props and costumes) on the big screen. This film portrays the old fairy tale of Jack and the Beanstalk. Jack, a farm boy, trades his master’s horse (instead of a cow in this version of the tale) to a monk for a sack of beans. The beans, when planted, grow a huge beanstalk that reaches up to a giants’ land. The giants hate humans and when the humans and giants meet there is warfare in a countryside setting and a castle is also beseiged. Plus, as a watery sideline, Jack and Princess Isabelle also fall in love.

Acting, characters and storyline detail are all weak but pleasant enough. The action element of the film is ok. What makes it fun is the boyish humour of Nicholas Hoult and the beautiful sets, countryside, costumes, and props. McGregor also puts in a small amount of captivating acting as a captain of the guard.

Worth seeing if you have nothing better to do and like period action/fantasty movies – or are a fan of McGregor or Hoult, this tale or period pieces. Otherwise, wait till it comes out for the “box” (ie your television, etc), savour the tale on the page or simply arrange a trip to the English countryside or a castle.

Further information:
Jack the Giant Slayer (IMDB)
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey – review (The London Reviewer)
Jack and the Beanstalk (Wikipedia)
Jack the Giant Slayer (Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Beautiful Creatures (2013)
UK release date: 13 February 2013
Viewing date: 17 March 2013
Stats: Directed by Richard LaGravenese, screenplay by Richard LaGravenese. Novel by Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl. Stars Alden Ehrenreich, Alice Englert, Jeremy Irons, Emma Thompson.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: **** (out of 5)

 2013 has and is going to see a lot of fairytales and supernatural flicks hit the big screen – maybe every year does – but this year doesn’t seem able to stop (with the floodgates actually opening with the release of Snow White and the Huntsman in May, 2012).

This version of Beautiful Creatures, which stars Jeremy Irons and Emma Thompson, is about witches in “The South” of America. Galvin, South Carolina is a quiet, Deep South town with 12 churches, banned books, Civil War re-enactment battlefields, weeping willow trees, heavy rains, swamps, woods, biblebashers, an old Southern mansion – and not much else… except a few witches (which refer to themselves as “casters” ie “spell- casters”) – who also (of course, according to OTT American movies) inhabit the mansion (well the majority of them at least).

If you like the supernatural and gothic things, then you will like this film. You will like it probably only for the mood as there is not much plot or character development, instead just pretty versions of the following: sets, costumes, acting, scenery, and humourous one-liners of dialogues from the characters.

This movie stars Alden Ehrenreich as Ethan Wate (a human who likes to read and has grown up in Galvin) and Alice Englert as Lena Duchannes a witch, from out of town, who is just about to reach her 16th birthday and her “true nature” will decide if she is a good witch or bad witch. Can you tell how cheesy this movie is? Yup, it is nearly all teenage angst and “down South” stereotyping. However, for some reason both Jeremy Irons and Emma Thompson are great in their parts as, generally, grim and bad witches in a demure Addams Family kind of way. Emma is a bit insane as well. Jeremy is just cool and dark. Fantastic to see him in this film as he is very together. So that’s the film for you. Stumble through a badly told teenage romance and some funny spell casting parts and some pretty old South sets.

Better than some films, worse than many. The kind of thing worth watching for free on TV if you must catch something ‘Southern Gothic’. That’s about it. Still gets 4 out of 5 stars, however, as Irons’ and Thompson’s acting is excellent as are the costumes and sets. 

Further information:
Beautiful Creatures (IMDB)
Snow White and the Huntsman review (The London Reviewer)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Hitchcock (USA 2012, UK 2013)
UK Release date: 8 February 2013
Viewing date: 14 March 2013
Stats: Directed by Sacha Gervasi. Written by John J. McLaughlin (screenplay), Stephen Rebello (book). Stars Anthony HopkinsHelen MirrenScarlett Johansson.
Running time: 98 mins
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating:  ***** (out of 5)

Nutshell review: Wow! The trailer looks ‘ok’ for this but once you actually see this film you feel like you actually get to know, and be in the company of Alfred Hitchcock. Set during the filming of Psycho, you not only get to learn what happens during the production of this movie, but also about the life of Alfred Hitchcock (Anthony Hopkins),  his wife Alma Reville (Helen Mirren) and leading lady Janet Leigh (Scarlett Johannson) during this time.  Hopkins and Mirren are the leads with excellent support from Johannson. They truly take on the roles and Hopkins becomes the brash, willful, intelligent and humorous ‘Hitch’ – while Mirren and Johannson become just two of the the winsome and sharp women who supported him.

Kudos, also, to director Gervasi for the inspired yet subtle direction of these actors as well as the well-done script, settings, costumes and more that made one feel like they were truly back in 1950s America – Psycho was released in 1959. Well worth a trip to the cinema to see this great biographic – and now historic – film.

Further information:

Hitchcock (IMDB)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Oz The Great and Powerful (2013 – seen in 2D, also available in 3D)
UK Release date: 8 March 2013
Viewing date: 11 March 2013
Stats: Original story written by L Frank Baum. Directed by Sam Raimi. Screenplay by Mitchell Kapner, David Lindsay-Abaire . Stars James Franco as Oz, Michelle Williams as Glinda, Mila Kunis as Theonora, Rachel Weisz as Evanora, Joey King as China Girl.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating:  *** (out of 5)

Nutshell review: A fun “prequel” to the story/movie The Wizard of Oz. Reminds one sort of the story Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West by Gregory MacGuire. and also a little bit of the musical, Wicked by Winnie Holzman.

This story is about the journey of the magician Oz to the magical land “over the rainbow” and also gives insight into the “bad” and “good” witches of Oz as well as its humble inhabitants who rely on the witches for guidance and protection.

This is a fun mix of real characters and animation. All a bit too 3D and modern for me, but there is good character development of both Oz and Glinda the good witch as well as the monkey who is Oz’s friend and sort of “bell hop” and also the China Girl. Thanks to the writers and kudos to Sam Raimi – probably his most exciting ever film. He is ok, but if only he could make the imaginative jumpls like Peter Jackson did with The Lord of the Rings trilogy and The Hobbit: an Unexpected Journey (2012).  He does try to be creative though, although a bit too much cartoonish animation is used and takes away from the wonderful naturalness of the original film.

Worth seeing but only after seeing the original. Cast is ok, but its more about the original story. James Franco is quite funny in parts though, as is China Girl’s character.

Further information:
Oz The Great and Powerful (IMDB)
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L Frank Baum (Wikipedia)
L Frank Baum (Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Stoker
UK Release date: 1 March 2013
Viewing date: 11 March 2013
Stats: Written by Wentworth Miller, Erin Cressida Wilson (contributing writer). Directed by Chan-wook Park. Stars Mia Wasikowska as India Stoker, Nicole Kidman as Evelyn Stoker and Matthew Goode as Charles Stoker.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating:  0 – ZERO stars (out of 5)

Nutshell review: And I thought the Twilight Series was bad… what is there to say about this film, except what a waste of time. The only nice thing was seeing a beautiful old house set in nice grounds somewhere in America (the film was supposedly set in Connecticut, although who knows where the old, large house was?).

Stoker is a twisted film about a rich white family that has murdering mad people in it. There is nothing redeeming about this film and shows that whoever produced it was very bored and had money to waste. Why, also, the writers wrote it is beyond me? Were they trying to mock wealthy families in the USA? Who knows – but it came out horribly. This film was only a sickening show of opulence and the money that Hollywood has to waste. Why Nicole Kidman agreed to be in it, who knows? The same with Mia Wasikowska or Matthew Goode. If anyone has any acting talent it is not visible in this film.

The name Stoker reminds me of Bram Stoker, the writer of Dracula,  pretty much the only reason why I decided to see it. Also, it looked like it might be a good thriller from the poster. The trailers of it were weak and I should have formed my opinion from them, but they can, sometimes, be deceiving.  A very sad waste of time – for all that go and also all those involved in the production.

India Stoker is a teenage girl and madness runs in her family. She is brought up learning to hunt. She is fairly isolated throughout her life and things get very twisted when her Uncle Charlie, a consciousless murderer turns up at her house and wants to be her lover, as well as her mother’s – among other things. It feels like the authors tried to steal genres from Heathers, the newer Addams Family movies and the 1962 film Lolita (based on the book by Vladimir Nabokov) and failed horribly. Skip this. Don’t even bother when it comes out on TV, video, etc.

Further information:
Stoker (IMDB)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Django Unchained (USA 2012 release/UK 2013 release)
UK Release date: 18 January 2013
Viewing date: February 2013
Stats: Written and directed by Quentin Tarantino. Stars
Jamie Foxx as Django, Christoph Waltz as Dr King Schultz, Leonardo DiCaprio as Calvin Candie and Samuel L. Jackson as Stephen.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: **** (out of 5)

Nutshell review: Django Unchained is a captivating film, so it’s worth watching for that reason – ie the acting, the sets, settings, costumes and script are all are literally, thrilling. Jamie Foxx, Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L Jackson also have amazing acting skills, which, when coupled with the sweeping settings of both the historic, countryside bits of the America’s South and North/Plain States are amazing. The script is ok but has much gratuitous violence, which Tarantino is known for. I have no doubt that slavery in the USA was bloody and horrific but there is something sick about how Tarantino sort of plays games of violence on screen.

Django is an ex-slave who is a good marksman with a pistol. He is recruited by German bounty hunter Dr King Schultz to help bring American outlaw criminals to justice in the 1800s. While looking for certain bounty hunters, Django and Schultz go to the South, specifically Mississippi, and meet plantation owner Calvin Candie who is holding Django’s wife as a slave. After taking us through several bounty huntings at the beginning of the film, we then watch the majority of the film as Django tries to get his wife back and he and King take on a plantation full of twisted white supremacists, who are headed up by Candie. We also meet, the slave-butler Stephen, played by Jackson, who helps the “white folk”, who knows why? Maybe because he is terrified of getting beaten and abused on a regular basis.

This is a heavy and intense film with some excellent historic content and excellent acting despite too much gratuitous violence. Worth seeing to see some interesting parts of America and that Jamie Foxx, Samuel L Jackson and Leonardo DiCaprio are all amazing actors.

Further information:
Django Unchained (IMDB)

Read Full Post »

Film review: Lincoln (2013)
Release date: 25 January 2013
Viewing date: February 2013
Stats: Directed by Steven Spielberg. Stars Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field and Tommy Lee Jones.
Review by: Alexa Williamson
Rating: **** (out of 5)

Nutshell review: This is, overall, great stuff because Day-Lewis is a fantastic actor and it is great to see him being so powerful. Wow – on the acting front and you get a dose of American history here.

Daniel Day-Lewis truly becomes Abraham Lincoln (you forget he is Day-Lewis) in the film and we learn about the events leading up to the freeing of slaves, the passing of this amendment to the Constitution, what the Civil War, Washington DC and life were like at this point (the movie is set between c 1863-65). The movie takes us up to Lincoln’s assassination in 1865. A bit slow moving but Day-Lewis’s acting, the costumes, sets and settings are all great. The picture is worth seeing if you have the time and are a Day-Lewis fan. If you don’t have the spare time, unless you are a history fan, well it can be a little bit average and maybe you won’t want to sit in a cinema for 2 hours and 30 minutes.

Further information:
Lincoln (IMDB)
Abraham Lincoln (Wikipedia)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.